Wednesday 22 June 2016

In, Out, Shake it all about.

This referendum, though called to appease Tories, has clearly exposed the long-standing disconnect between the UK political establishment and the public.
Politicians and the metropolitan liberal-thinking collective (London etc) have failed to engage with the vast majority of workers in the UK, failed to understand their views and concerns (genuine or perceived). And now the UK is at risk of leaving an organisation that has pushed forward progressive ideas and secured workers rights. It does have it faults, but it can only be reformed from within not from a distance.
Instead of grouping all brexiter's together and labelling them as ignorant and racists, there should have been positive engagement to inform, not threats or dismissals but an expression of empathy towards their concerns.
Of course the Right-wing media have promoted their agenda and misled the public but the Left, centre and EU could have done hell of a lot more in order to counter the toxic rhetoric.
Newsspeak hopes the UK remain, but whatever the result, the political landscape will change and that aforementioned bubble needs to start understanding they do not always know best.

Friday 1 August 2014

Mo Money...Mo Problems...

Majority of people tend not to like paying for a service they assume to be free, especially if you are already paying a form of subscription for a service that is viewed as poor. It is inventible that people will get upset and angry and a small group may even get physical, but a lady in the good ol' USA took her frustration to a whole new-level.  
















The service provider in question is the largest broadcasting and cable company in the world based on revenue, one with massive political clout with easy access to the White House and at the centre of a scandal that could see it using its power to influence how much coverage internet-providers supply and forcing users to cough up more dough.

Shame the lady below didn't have access to the boardroom. 

Taken from http://www.abqjournal.com/

Unanticipated Comcast fees made one Albuquerque woman so angry she pulled a gun on a worker for the cable company, according to a criminal complaint filed in Metropolitan Court.
Gloria Baca-Lucero, 48, was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon Monday and booked into jail. She was released later that day.
Police say a Comcast serviceman went to do work in Baca-Lucero’s house near San Pedro and San Antonio in the Northeast Heights on Monday, according to the complaint. Baca-Lucero said she thought the work would be free, but the worker told her there would be a fee. She called customer service, and someone on that line also told her she had to pay.
The worker then told her if she didn’t sign for the fee he would leave. She refused to pay, and the worker told police as he was loading tools into his vehicle, Baca-Lucero grabbed one of his tool bags and took it inside her house.
When the worker went to get it, he said she told him he couldn’t have his tools back and pulled out a black handgun from her pocket, pointing at his torso, the complaint states.
The worker told police he put his hands up because he “didn’t want to get shot,” and left the property before calling 911.
Baca-Lucero told police he left the tools and she took them inside, and wouldn’t give them back to him when he returned. When the worker refused to leave, she pointed the gun in the air. He left, and she then also called police, the complaint states.
When police searched her home, they found a black Glock, along with a Glock magazine and 11 rounds. They also found the tool bag, according to the court document.

Tuesday 10 June 2014

Warhol's Angel.

Famous figures and art, two entities closely tied together and the kudos of one helps the other. However, besides or because of this close relationship things can soon splatter and turn sour and without any strokes of luck, legal proceedings can occur. 

Which is what happened when Ryan O'Neal, that all American good-looking film star was taken to court by the University of Texas over the ownership of Andy Warhol's Farrah Fawxcett portrait and a signed napkin.  

Both O'Neal and the University of Texas presented strong emotional cases as to why they should keep the multi-million dollar valued Warhol; from the University of Texas expressing how much Fawxcett loved the institution to O'Neal, who was the one-time lover of the beauteous Charlie's Angels actress' Fawxcett, testifying that he spoke to the painting (unconfirmed wherever the painting spoke back).  

Read below as to how this saga has now concluded its '15 minutes of fame'. 

----------------------------------------------------

Ryan O’Neal finally has Farrah Fawcett for keeps.
The actor and on-off-again lover of ’70s siren Fawcett has settled a contentious lawsuit with the University of Texas at Austin over a portrait of the late actress by pop icon Andy Warhol and a drawing on a cloth napkin also inscribed by the artist.
After nearly three years of litigation and more than $1 million in costs, the university has quietly dropped its appeal and settled a lawsuit with O’Neal, conceding a Los Angeles jury’s December ruling that he owned the portrait of Fawcett.
The napkin drawing, which the Los Angeles County Superior Court jury determined to be owned equally by O’Neal and the university, will be sold at auction according to the agreement, with proceeds split between them.
The agreement was reached May 7 but became known only Friday after McClatchy filed a Texas open records request this week.
It is, effectively, a total victory for O’Neal, who will get $25,000 in court costs from the university as part of the agreement. He gave emotional testimony at the three-week trial in Los Angeles County Superior Court, saying he talks to the painting, which hangs over his bed at his Malibu home, and that he wanted to keep it for his and Fawcett’s son, Redmond O’Neal. The actors never married, but were together for many years.
Fawcett, a Texas beauty from Corpus Christi, attended the University of Texas at Austin in the 1960s before moving to Hollywood to pursue a modeling and acting career. A star of the popular ’70s television show “Charlie’s Angels,” Fawcett died of cancer in 2009 and left all her artwork to the institution in her living trust.
Her love for the university was part of the reason the school fought so hard for the artwork, even though there were two nearly identical Warhol portraits of Fawcett and the university already had one of them.
“We worked hard to honor the wishes of our donor and will always seek to honor donors’ wishes,” Gary Susswein, spokesman for the University of Texas at Austin, told McClatchy. “In so doing, we also sought to secure a piece of art that has cultural significance and is valuable in our academic, educational and outreach missions. At this point in time, though, this agreement is the appropriate resolution.”
O’Neal’s attorney, Marty Singer, didn’t respond to a request for comment.
The napkin, held by the university, shows split hearts with the inscriptions “to Farrah F. and Ryan O.” and in a corner, a heart with the words “Houston Texas” in it. (They were at a dinner in Houston when Warhol grabbed a napkin and drew on it.) It’s signed, “Andy Warhol.”
During the trial, experts for the university valued the napkin at $3,500. Susswein said there was no date yet for an auction for the framed 20-by-20-inch napkin. The colorful portrait of Fawcett, which shows her with bright green eyes and eye shadow and red lips, was valued at $12 million. But both may well be worth more after the publicity from the trial.

Thursday 29 May 2014

Mad as Hell.


NewsSpeak, by its very nature, believes wholeheartedly in the right of freedom of speech.  It is a guiding principle that has enabled cultures and countries to fight against oppression and ensure that all citizens can express themselves freely without fear of retribution.

This right is governed by limitations such as ‘libel’, ‘classified information’ and ‘hate speech’ and it is this last area, which our following story relates to. 


A young man took exception to a sign displayed by a church (on its property) that suggested that if you didn’t believe in God you may end up in Hell. This young man was so offended he did what any other ‘reasonable’ person would do; he called the Police, whom due to national guidelines had to act.

Now, NewsSpeak is offended on various occasions and more often than not offends others on a daily basis, however, it would never seek to bring the Police into the matter and instead by using intelligent thought would counter the argument or message or just rise above it.

And on that note, NewsSpeak will leave you with this; "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"

----------------------
The Attleborough Baptist Church sign was looked at as a “hate incident” after Robert Gladwin objected to the slogan “if you think there is no God, you’d better be right” - with flames underneath the message.
But police said the pastor of the church had agreed to remove the sign.

Mr Gladwin, 20, who spotted the sign on Leys Lane while heading home to Hargham Road, said: “I was just astounded really. We live in the 21st century and they have put that message - that non-Christians will burn in hell - up to try and scare people into joining their mentality.”
Mr Gladwin decided to contact the police after comparing the message to other forms of hate speech.

A spokesperson for the police said: “Norfolk Constabulary received a report regarding a poster outside a church in Attleborough which was deemed offensive by the complainant.

“National guidance required us to investigate the circumstances and the matter has been recorded as a hate incident. Having spoken to the pastor of the church, it has been agreed the poster will be taken down.”
Mr Gladwin added: “It is my basic understanding that Christianity is inclusive and loving in nature.

“The message being displayed outside of the church could not be further from the often uttered phrase ‘love thy neighbour’.”
Chris Copsey, of the Norfolk Humanists, described the sign as “pernicious nonsense”.

He added: “I believe the people of Attleborough have more common sense than to give this sign any credence.”
But the complaints have provoked concerns about the church’s freedom of speech.

Terry Sanderson, president of the National Secular Society, said: “Personally I don’t find it offensive. But we did fight a long battle of freedom of speech together with Christian groups because we believe that freedom of speech is essential to a functioning society.

“If you don’t give it to everybody then it isn’t free speech and as long as they aren’t inciting violence or trying to get people to do things that are against the law then I think it is acceptable to say whatever you want to say.”

Mr Sanderson added that if he felt uncomfortable with the sign, he would put up one himself – and said that police activity over the message was equivalent to “banning the Bible”.

The sign is filled with upcoming events and at the bottom says that visitors “can always be sure of a very warm welcome”.
The Rev Simon Ward of the Diocese of Norwich believed the sign was intended as a vessel for debate.

“I guess they are trying to open a conversation and cause people to think. However, I think there are more positive conversations that you could have and more positive reasons for coming to church,” he said.
Attleborough Baptist Church was not available for comment.

Thursday 10 May 2012

Fight for your right...

NewsSpeak is continuing the School theme (see previous story) and the battles that students undertake to secure decent grades.

 In this story, however, the students from a Canadian University take their fight all the way to an Canadian Court of Appeal in a bid that will have serious implications for free speech via social media. In this case, a University punished a set of twin students who openly criticised their Professor on Facebook.

The students fought back and took it all the way to the high levels of the legal establishment, ensuring that students have the right to disagree with a school's policy and slag off their teachers...just what Facebook was invented for! Taken from the 'Globe and Mail' --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alberta’s highest court is siding with two University of Calgary students who say their Charter rights were violated when the school punished them for criticizing a professor on Facebook.

 The Court of Appeal upheld Wednesday a lower court ruling that found the Charter of Rights and Freedoms do apply when universities are meting out discipline to students. 

 The case involved twin brothers, Keith and Steven Pridgen. In 2007, both posted critical remarks in a Facebook group devoted to complaints about one of their professors, Aruna Mitra, who was teaching a law and society course for the first time. 

 The court decision describes how the comments were highly critical of Prof. Mitra’s qualifications and teaching skills. She was described as “inept,” “illogically abrasive” and “inconsistent.” One post suggested Prof. Mitra should be “drawn and quartered” for all to see. 

 Steven Pridgen complained about a mark. “Somehow I think she just got lazy and gave everybody a 65 … that’s what I got. Does anybody know how to apply to have it remarked?” he posted. Keith Pridgen posted how he was excited when he learned Prof. Mitra wasn’t teaching any course the following semester. “I think we should all congratulate ourselves for leaving a Mitra-free legacy,” he wrote. 

 Prof. Mitra complained to university administration and the school went after 10 members of the Facebook group, including the Pridgens. 

The university found all of the students guilty of non-academic misconduct. Keith Pridgen was put on probation and he and Steve were told to apologize. “I want to state emphatically that you are not being sanctioned for expressing your opinions on this site. You are at liberty to do so,” read the letter sent to Keith Pridgen. “It is important, however, that your views are not based on false premises, conjectures, and unsubstantiated assertions that are injurious to individuals or institutions and their hard-won reputations.” 

After being rebuffed by the university appeals process, the brothers appealed to the Court of Queen’s Bench, arguing they had a right to free speech. When the judge agreed with the brothers, the university took the matter to the Court of Appeal. 

 The school, backed by the Association of Colleges and Universities Canada and the Governors of the University of Alberta, didn’t dispute that the brothers’ rights had been violated. It argued that a previous Supreme Court ruling precludes the application of the Charter to public universities. 

 The three judges on the appeals panel all agreed to dismiss the appeal, although each of them wrote their own reasons for arriving at their decision.

 Justice Marina Paperny said that the Charter does apply to university discipline. Justice Bruce McDonald ruled that the university’s findings were unreasonable, but that there was no need to involve Charter rights to come to that conclusion. 

And Justice Brian O’Ferrall sided with the students, citing the university’s failure to consider their civil liberties. “I was a little bit worried when I first read the decision because I thought it was a split decision, but then I realized that it was only a split on the reasons for the decision,” Keith Pridgen said when reached by phone Wednesday. “Right from the get-go, for me, we didn’t do anything wrong … It’s been good broad-based support across the whole country and I think I’ve been feeling pretty affirmed in my position, just even from public opinion.” 

 The university did not immediately respond to a request for comment, nor did the Association of Colleges and Universities Canada. Keith Pridgen graduated last spring from the University of Calgary with a degree in political science. 

He worked for the Wildrose party in last month’s Alberta election and wants to go to law school. His brother transferred to Mount Royal University in Calgary and earned a criminal justice degree. He is now doing his masters degree in California. Keith Pridgen said he’s still happy to hold a degree from the school he fought through the courts. “I don’t hold anything against the university,” he said. “I think that there’s a big difference between a lot of the faculty that taught me and the administration who made, I think, some poor decisions along the way.”

Thursday 26 April 2012

Schools Out...

Newsspeak suspects that most readers during their school days often dreamt of punishing teachers when expected grades didn’t materialise, or just punishing them for the fun of it. Well, in West Midnapore, India, a group of disgruntled students’ deicide to take matters into their own hands when the school failed them in a recent exam. Taken from Asianage.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Class XI students of a school in West Midnapore district who had failed in the annual examination, on Thursday locked up the all the 50-odd staff and secretary after their meeting failed to yield any result.
 The students of the Nayabasan Janakalyan Vidyapeeth at Gopiballabhpur said they would not open the gate till they all were promoted to class XII, said Ashok Pattanaik, secretary of the school's managing committee.

Altogether 90 of the 247 students of Class XI of the school had failed in the annual examination conducted by the West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education. The school authorities could not do anything in this regard due to norms of the Council, he said.

The question papers of Class XI are set by the Council but the assessment of answers scripts are done internally.

 The results of the Class XI examination are to be declared by the end of this month across the state. The meeting between students and the authorities including the secretary began at 9 am but failed to resolve the issue till 10.30 when the school was closed for the day, Pattanaik said.

 When students of all the others classes left, these 90 students locked the outside gate keeping inside 52 persons - all the teaching and non-teaching staff and Pattanaik. Sources in the local police station said they had been informed by the school about the incident but were hesitating to take any action as a large number of school students were involved.

Saturday 31 March 2012

Ice Ice Baby


Yes readers, it has been a while and NewsSpeak has no firm reason as to it's absence, but the aim now is to update this Blog regularly (whole point of a blog really) and though there will be lapses, NewsSpeak will strive to deliver you interesting, humorous and thought-provoking news you won't find from any of the mainstream news outlets. It's a thankless task, but NewsSpeak takes on this responsibility with a real conviction.

Speaking of which, the following story centres on a upcoming court case in Melbourne, Australia, which features Australia's largest airline' Qantas which has yet to recover from industrial unrest with it's unionised workforce and the drug' Meth now part of popular culture thanks in part to the highly acclaimed TV show 'Breaking Bad'.

Taken from the 'Sydney Morning Herald'

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
A VETERAN Qantas airline steward has been charged in Melbourne and later accused in court of using his job to import suspected ''ice'' from Los Angeles worth about $260,000.

Samuel Berl Kaufman, 49, was arrested last Friday in the basement car park of his South Yarra apartment on his return from the US after police received an anonymous tip.

A member of a Victoria Police divisional response unit told a court on Monday that Kaufman was found in possession of about 250 grams of methamphetamine.

Senior Constable James Howden said Kaufman's 17-year career with Qantas had included numerous long-haul flights and he had developed ''connections'' in the airline industry.

In opposing bail, Senior Constable Howden said Kaufman may know people in customs and other ''areas of airports'' that made it easy for him to bring drugs into Australia.
He told prosecutor Ashley Bird that Kaufman, who has no prior convictions, had worked for Qantas as a long-haul and domestic airline steward and was a risk of reoffending if bailed.

He said police executed search warrants on his home and car in which he admitted the latter contained drugs, ice and GHB.
Senior Constable Howden said the drugs were found in a plastic bag with associated items that included an ice pipe, several ''deal'' bags, plungers and empty glass vials.

Along with two small amounts of white powder that tested positive for methamphetamine, Kaufman admitted that liquid in two small bottles was GHB, he said.
Senior Constable Howden told the court that on arrest Kaufman produced two heavily taped, plain-packaged envelopes from his pants he said held cash a friend in the US had asked him to give to someone in Australia.
Kaufman allegedly said he collected the envelopes in Los Angeles that had possibly contained between $US10,000 ($9435) and $US20,000 that he had not declared to customs.

But Senior Constable Howden said the envelopes contained two blocks of ''white crystal'' substance that weighed 250 grams. He agreed with defence lawyer Kelly McKay there was no evidence Kaufman had paid for the larger drugs.
Kaufman faces nine charges, including two of importation and one of trafficking a commercial quantity of methamphetamine.

A Qantas spokesman contacted The Age on Wednesday afternoon to say that Kaufman had tendered his resignation.

Magistrate Jan Maclean yesterday bailed Kaufman with ''some reluctance'' on strict conditions - that included a $20,000 surety, reporting to police and surrendering his two passports - she felt would reduce the police fears to a manageable level.

Wednesday 13 July 2011

"This is a private matter"

After a short break Newsspeak is back and to kick-off proceedings Newsspeak brings it’s readers a story featuring some common themes; revenge, assault, false imprisonment and body parts. For the male readers out there, Newsspeak advises caution as this story, set in the good ol’ US of A, features a woman who tries to make mince meat out of her estranged husband’s private parts. Taken from the AP.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A Southern California woman was jailed Wednesday after authorities said she drugged her estranged husband, tied him to a bed before cutting off his penis and put it through a garbage disposal.

Garden Grove police Lt. Jeff Nightengale said Catherine Kieu Becker drugged a meal and served it to the victim, whose name was not released, shortly before the attack Monday night.

Nightengale said the 51-year-old man felt sick, went to lie down and lost consciousness. The 48-year-old Becker then tied the victim's arms and legs to the bed with rope, removed his clothes and attacked him with a 10-inch kitchen knife as he awoke, Nightengale said.
"He was conscious when his penis was removed," Nightengale said.
Nightengale said Becker put the penis in the garbage disposal and turned it on.
The lieutenant said Becker called 911 to report a medical emergency and told arriving officers "he deserved it" before pointing to the room where the victim was found tied to the bed, bleeding profusely. Authorities did not release details on a possible motive in the attack.

A telephone listing for Becker's residence could not be located and no one was home in the apartment.

Nightengale said Becker was taken into custody without incident and refused to talk to officers further. He said the couple was in the process of a divorce.
Bail for Becker was set at $1 million after she was booked at the Orange County Jail for investigation of aggravated mayhem, false imprisonment, assault with a deadly weapon, administering a drug with intent to commit a felony, poisoning and spousal abuse.

She was due in court Wednesday.

The victim underwent surgery and was listed in good condition at the University of California at Irvine Medical Center in Orange, hospital spokesman John Murray told the Orange County Register.

The newspaper said the victim declined to comment when he was reached by phone Tuesday afternoon.

"This is a private matter," he said.

Neighbor Lourdes Painter told The Associated Press the couple had been married since December, did not have any children and seemed very quiet. Becker and her husband lived in a second-story condo in the working class complex. Painter lives in the unit below them.

Nightengale said a database search showed no previous calls to the house for any past problems. He didn't know what kind of food the couple ate for dinner. Detectives took the food as evidence and were analyzing it.

No private attorney was listed on booking documents. If Becker seeks a public defender, one could be appointed at her first court appearance.

In 1993, Lorena Bobbitt cut off her husband's penis in Virginia and threw it out of her car window into a field on the side of the road. She claimed years of sexual abuse drove her to the attack, and she was acquitted by reason of insanity. His penis was later reattached.

Wednesday 27 April 2011

Mystery Thriller from Hollywood


Hollywood; that alluring, almost magical place, where for years people across the globe have travelled to in search of fame, fortune or just to view the famous Hollywood sign. Now it seems people want to expand on this and have resorted to pinching Tinseltown related objects.

This news story taken form the LA Times is a nice little piece that contains tales of crime, intrigue and conspiracy within a small LA community. Perfect for NewsSpeak.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
First it was directional signs for tourists that vanished, and now 1923 bronze 'Hollywoodland' plaques marking the stone gateway to the community have disappeared. Theories abound.

Residents living on the narrow lanes beneath the Hollywood sign have quarreled for months over small directional signs pointing tourists to a place where the iconic Tinseltown symbol can be viewed and photographed.

The road signs benefited homeowners on the street that dead-ends at the locked fire road that leads to Mt. Lee and the Hollywood sign. Unfortunately, the signs funneled sightseers and tour buses onto other nearby streets. Then the signs mysteriously disappeared. Whether that's a crime depends on which street you live on.

But now real thieves have stolen two signs that nearly everyone in the hillside neighborhood mourns losing: the historic 1923 "Hollywoodland" bronze plaques that marked the stone gateway to the community.

"I was made aware of them being missing Saturday by a neighbor who wanted to show the plaques to a friend," said Jeff Meyer, owner of the nearby Hollywoodland Antiques shop and the caretaker of the gateway's clock.

On Tuesday, there were plenty of theories circulating at the north end of Beachwood Drive as to who may have taken the pair of 18-by-24-inch commemorative fixtures.

Tourists were at the top of the list, because the popularity of GPS devices has soared and droves of visitors are sent daily into Beachwood Canyon, thinking they can actually walk to the Hollywood sign.

Scrap metal scavengers were next, although many thought them unlikely suspects because lettered bronze markers are becoming harder to sell, despite a booming metals market.

Finally there were whispers that it might be one of the residents living beneath the Hollywood sign who is disgusted with the deluge of tourists that often clogs the neighborhood.

"Maybe it's an odd coincidence, but there's been an internal battle going on up here about signage. Maybe the controversy over that is behind this," Meyer said.

Authorities have no suspects, but people like Meyer are closely watching Craigslist and EBay to see if the two plaques pop up for sale.

Hollywood historian Greg Williams — whose family owns property in the Beachwood Canyon area — said he figures the plaques were swiped to be melted down. He said police would not take a report from residents over the weekend because the gateway is considered city property.

"My best guess is it was taken for salvage. Tourists don't usually go out with crowbars," and the Hollywoodland gate is not a traditional visitor attraction, Williams said.

"All the homeowners are upset," he said. "It's pretty despicable, but in this day and age anything is possible."

Sarajane Schwartz, president of the Hollywoodland Homeowners Assn., said the plaques' theft is only one example of lawlessness the neighborhood has recently experienced.

Anti-Semitic and anti-gay slurs were painted on a wall over the weekend, and the tourists' directional signs were taken. "And our homeowners association email was hijacked and illegal emails sent out," she said.

Schwartz was critical of what she described as efforts by the city "to designate our neighborhood as a tourism area. We're really mystified by that."

While her area has traditionally welcomed tourists, the onslaught of Hollywood sign searchers brought on by GPS devices is something "we can't manage anymore," she said.

The five directional signs pointing tourists away from Deronda Drive and toward another viewpoint were paid for by previous leaders of Schwartz's homeowners association and by another homeowner group: the competing Beachwood Canyon Neighborhood Assn.

Since their disappearance in February, there has been conflicting speculation over who was responsible. Before the $1,500 tourist signs were removed, one was covered over with a plastic bag by a resident disgruntled over traffic in the area.

"These signs literally said, 'Come on in,' " said Schwartz, who has lived in the canyon more than 30 years. "We're not Disneyland. We're not a tourist attraction."

Rival Beachwood Canyon Neighborhood Assn. President Fran Reichenbach speculated that the influx of tourists — "memento seekers" — might be to blame for the theft of the Hollywoodland plaques. She doubts that the plaques' disappearance is tied to the controversy over the directional signs.

Most residents support preservation of Hollywoodland's history, even if they are opposed to the wave of tourists, she said.

But Reichenbach said the tourists aren't going away. "They're here — it's a revenue stream that shouldn't be overlooked" for Los Angeles, she said.

So speculation continues and theories abound in Hollywoodland.

"I personally find it very suspicious the plaques were taken at this time when the two rival factions have taken down signs and are hiding them from each other," 31-year-resident Brian Van Zandt said.

"I miss them. They made you feel good when you walked past them and saw something historical smile back at you."

Tuesday 19 April 2011

All Shook Up.


This story follows on from the previous one in the sense that it is also set in Birmingham, UK. This time it has a more international feel and the main subject is a worldwide iconic figure. It occurred within the dazzling world of an Elvis impersonator convention, where two Elvis lookalikes became involved in a love tussle. One lookalike is even facing up to the likelihood of experiencing the true ‘Jailhouse Rock’.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

AN ELVIS tribute singer has admitted attacking a rival impersonator he wrongly believed was trying to seduce his wife at a lookalikes convention in Birmingham.

Michael Cawthray, of Epperton Road South, Rhos-on-Sea, pleaded guilty to assaulting Jeffrey Burton, a US citizen, causing him actual bodily harm at Warwick Crown Court yesterday.

The 48-year-old victim suffered a suspected broken nose during a scuffle at the Metropole Hotel at the NEC in the early hours on January 9 last year.

He was treated in hospital.

At an earlier hearing, the court heard that Mr Burton persuaded Mr Cawthray’s wife Sioned to share a nigh-cap in his hotel room when Cawthray burst in.

Mr Burton’s father, James Burton, was Presley’s guitarist from 1969 until the star’s death in 1977.

Following his guilty plea a High Court judge told Cawthray, aged 43, that the court will want to consider a sentenced that will address his ‘insecurities arising from jealousy and ill-temper’.

The convention was organised by the Elvis European Championships Ltd, of which Cawthray is a director.

He and Mr Burton were both staying at the hotel.

After Cawthray had entered his plea, Mrs Justice Dame Julia Macur commented: “He has no previous convictions, but they were serious injuries.”

Regan Peggs, defending, pointed out: “It was a relatively small fracture to the nose, rather than what was first thought. Having said that, there will have to be a pre-sentence report.”

Adjourning for the report to be prepared, Mrs Justice Macur told Cawthray: “You are pleading guilty to a nasty assault, with injuries that are certainly not insignificant, although thankfully not as bad as first thought.

“I think the court will benefit from having a report on you.

“While I give no indication as to sentence, the court will want to consider whether there is any community sentence which can address your insecurities arising from jealousies and ill-temper.”